95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.55%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-29.83%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.91%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 23.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.91%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 23.95%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.31%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 31.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 31.43%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 31.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
4.01%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while SA is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-41.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
115.32%
10Y CAGR of 115.32% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
59.36%
5Y CAGR of 59.36% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
46.89%
3Y CAGR of 46.89% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
580.66%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
89.09%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
506.67%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
114.08%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
934.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 300.16%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
1372.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 210.76%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
249.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 154.59%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.67%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.63%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.58%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-27.61%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.