PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.31%
Revenue growth of 1.31% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
428.44%
Gross profit growth of 428.44% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
1191.12%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 18.82%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1191.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 18.82%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
130.31%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
133.33%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
133.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-7.04%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
80.53%
10Y CAGR of 80.53% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
201.03%
5Y CAGR of 201.03% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-0.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1448.55%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
13.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-25.18%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2112.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 288.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
94.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 143.01%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.40%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
27.41%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-58.40%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.83%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.