PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.79%
Revenue growth of 29.79% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
45.14%
Gross profit growth of 45.14% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
50.25%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 4.76%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
50.25%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 4.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
51.37%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
36.36%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
36.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.22%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.14%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 2.87%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.41%
OCF growth at 75-90% of SA's 64.36%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
140.85%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 61.10%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
235.19%
10Y CAGR of 235.19% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
179.18%
5Y CAGR of 179.18% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
33.83%
3Y CAGR of 33.83% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
399.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 36.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
53.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 32.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
37.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 28.06%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 206.90%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
73.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 52.25%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.17%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-52.05%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.