95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.09%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.91%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.34%
EBIT growth below 50% of SA's 7.11%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.34%
Operating income growth under 50% of SA's 7.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-12.16%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 105.75%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 105.79%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.85%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 394.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-17.03%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 83.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
213.02%
10Y CAGR of 213.02% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
160.78%
5Y CAGR of 160.78% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
25.63%
3Y CAGR of 25.63% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
445.64%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 544.94%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
24.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 253.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
15.46%
Below 50% of SA's 108.21%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
443.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 366.18%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
64.29%
Below 50% of SA's 149.71%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.90%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 63.51%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.12%
Under 50% of SA's 59.03%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
270.10%
Debt growth of 270.10% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.