PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.55%
Revenue growth of 10.55% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
42.29%
Gross profit growth of 42.29% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
31.40%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.40%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
19.33%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-73.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-69.23%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.16%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 4.98%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.51%
Reduced diluted shares while SA is at 4.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.30%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
17.36%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
78.28%
10Y CAGR of 78.28% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
140.24%
5Y CAGR of 140.24% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
48.10%
3Y CAGR of 48.10% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.65%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
55.50%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
285.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
50.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 26.22%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
440.98%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SA's 449.45%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
60.50%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SA's 64.34%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.50%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SA's 230.43%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.83%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-75.82%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.97%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 73.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.