PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.28%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.67%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.08%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 58.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.08%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 58.20%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
30.00%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 67.94%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
75.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 67.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
75.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 67.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.40%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.45%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.22%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 38.87%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
5.22%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
210.94%
10Y CAGR of 210.94% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
149.23%
5Y CAGR of 149.23% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
51.45%
3Y CAGR of 51.45% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1261.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 6.02%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
330.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
67.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
426.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
133.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 67.46%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1497.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 593.69%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
453.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 341.34%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
68.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SA's 69.60%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 83.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 0.96%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.55%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.88%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.