PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.12%
Revenue growth of 23.12% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
25.66%
Gross profit growth of 25.66% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
24.79%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.79%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.19%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.10%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.14%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.14%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.07%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
32.30%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SA's 63.99%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
35.01%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
145787334.37%
10Y CAGR of 145787334.37% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
152.10%
5Y CAGR of 152.10% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
148.31%
3Y CAGR of 148.31% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
47649.80%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
215.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 267.31%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
197.01%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 601.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
55639.64%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
261.20%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
302.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 249.38%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
92.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 109.80%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.48%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SA's 90.82%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.82%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 15.84%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.14%
Under 50% of SA's 13.98%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.14%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.32%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SA's 175.86%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.