PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.91%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.35%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3.96%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 49.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-3.96%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 49.95%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.80%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 54.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.52%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 56.30%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 56.30%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 2.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 2.49%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.02%
Dividend growth of 0.02% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-0.62%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-82.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
56.04%
10Y CAGR of 56.04% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
176.47%
5Y CAGR of 176.47% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
229.79%
3Y CAGR of 229.79% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
12196.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
268.99%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
426.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
10696.01%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
273.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
367.76%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2022.77%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 722.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
155.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 224.77%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
97.53%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SA's 105.61%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.73%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SA's 163.85%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.38%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.69%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.