Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Revenue growth of 0.89% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Reduced diluted shares while SA is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y CAGR of 513.84% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.

5Y CAGR of 204.35% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.

3Y CAGR of 309.78% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 61.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 57.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 4.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 1714.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 108.25%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.

Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 69.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 0.29%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 0.47%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while SA invests at 42.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.