PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.29%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.43%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.43%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 78.75%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of SA's 78.62%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SA's 78.62%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-61.46%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.26%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
29250.87%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
369.06%
10Y CAGR of 369.06% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
194.35%
5Y CAGR of 194.35% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
73.48%
3Y CAGR of 73.48% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1883.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 196.26%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
271.01%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 143.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 126.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1508.48%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
165.13%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
7.72%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3689.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 622.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
157.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 132.61%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
62.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 34.18%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.62%
AR growth of 58.62% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 0.71%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.94%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 1.89%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.00%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 4.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.