95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.53%
Gross profit growth of 1.53% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of SA's 8.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of SA's 8.91%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 2.63%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-7.83%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 52.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-109.37%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 38.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
436.30%
10Y CAGR of 436.30% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
232.88%
5Y CAGR of 232.88% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
3.23%
3Y CAGR of 3.23% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
5716.61%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
275.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 67.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-10.86%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
355.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
299.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-35.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 31.68%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 685.69%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 102.33%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
41.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 26.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SA invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-13.59%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.93%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.04%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.