PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Revenue growth of 11.63% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
9.27%
Gross profit growth of 9.27% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
9.27%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SA's 12.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
9.27%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of SA's 12.75%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-92.92%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 24.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-94.44%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 26.43%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-94.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 26.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 2.06%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 2.06%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-60.06%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
17.39%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 891.52%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
8.48%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
5Y CAGR of 107.92% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-11.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
154.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 302.56%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
132.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 194.05%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-29.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 141.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
118.90%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-88.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-96.72%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 32.51%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SA stands at 492.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 103.44%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
40.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 15.57%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.67% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-64.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 5.91%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.66%
1.25-1.5x SA's 2.06%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
0.03%
Debt growth of 0.03% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.