PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.00%
Revenue growth of 26.00% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-1.07%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.07%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 21.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.07%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 21.85%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.72%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 35.73%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.98%
Share count expansion well above SA's 3.46%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.94%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 3.46%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.62%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 86.64%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
113.34%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
252.80%
10Y CAGR of 252.80% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
46.85%
5Y CAGR of 46.85% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-28.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
388.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 10.55%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
38.42%
Below 50% of SA's 87.50%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-44.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 19.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
230.32%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-14.41%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 21.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-66.75%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 39.79%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1009.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 643.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
105.03%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 35.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
37.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 6.78%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.64%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SA invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.32%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.23%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 5.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.41%
We have a declining book value while SA shows 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-10.63%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.