PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Revenue growth of 30.83% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
16.30%
Gross profit growth of 16.30% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
2.77%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.77%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-76.45%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-75.00%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 9.58%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-75.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 12.84%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.35%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.35%
Reduced diluted shares while SA is at 3.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.53%
Dividend growth of 6.53% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
34.00%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-875.03%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 23.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
425.17%
10Y CAGR of 425.17% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
17.39%
5Y CAGR of 17.39% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-38.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
697.66%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-6.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is at 59.94%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-53.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 39.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1205.32%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 30.45%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
619.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 403.88%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
60.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 32.33%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while SA is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SA invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-43.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
12.44%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 4.43%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-4.09%
We have a declining book value while SA shows 5.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
126.58%
Debt growth of 126.58% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SA's 100.06%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.