PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.48%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.49%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.71%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 27.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-22.71%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 27.38%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
124.21%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
123.81%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
123.81%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-14.72%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 72.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
114.79%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 35.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
233.81%
10Y CAGR of 233.81% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
3.82%
5Y CAGR of 3.82% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-19.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
275.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 28.07%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-21.68%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-39.59%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 76.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
36.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-70.63%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 34.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-72.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 34.51%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
379.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 420.86%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
52.05%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 33.54%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
13.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 4.59%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.29%
AR growth of 64.29% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.14%
Under 50% of SA's 1.19%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.48%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.