PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.82%
Revenue growth of 9.82% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
27.82%
Gross profit growth of 27.82% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
33.04%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 0.17%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
33.04%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 0.17%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
37.61%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 84.35%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
35.71%
EPS growth under 50% of SA's 84.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
35.71%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SA's 84.85%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.90%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 2.48%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 2.48%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-47.91%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.34%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 125.62%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-582.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
179.16%
10Y CAGR of 179.16% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
0.97%
5Y CAGR of 0.97% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
13.13%
3Y CAGR of 13.13% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
185.85%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 119.92%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-22.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is at 103.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
9.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
84.25%
Similar net income/share CAGR to SA's 89.97%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-50.72%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 93.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 87.65%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
302.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 299.05%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
57.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 22.87%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
20.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 8.61%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.03% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-56.25%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SA invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-15.57%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 1.67%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.65%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
90.51%
Debt growth of 90.51% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.