PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.84%
Revenue growth of 10.84% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-5.28%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-86.91%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-86.84%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-86.84%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 12.76%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 12.76%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
17.11%
Dividend growth of 17.11% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
8.12%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
127.02%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 22.16%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
196.24%
10Y CAGR of 196.24% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
7.88%
5Y CAGR of 7.88% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
24.99%
3Y CAGR of 24.99% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
192.99%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-14.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is at 5.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
13.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 41.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-77.12%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SA is at 9.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-93.99%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 65.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-90.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 20.11%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
285.20%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 193.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
49.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 1.04%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
18.79%
Positive short-term equity growth while SA is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.97%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-42.97%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SA invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-20.14%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.66%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-11.30%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 15.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.