PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.42%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.86%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-23.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-23.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
463.45%
Net income growth above 1.5x SA's 29.52%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
460.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 20.89%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
460.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 20.89%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-31.36%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 9.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-31.00%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 24.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
124.38%
10Y CAGR of 124.38% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-20.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-3.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.65%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-41.38%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-15.46%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
22.82%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-66.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 23.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-37.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 35.04%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
256.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 240.77%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
44.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 14.69%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.38%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 7.32%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.26%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.10%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.73%
Under 50% of SA's 12.67%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.81%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
SG&A growth well above SA's 40.99%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.