PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Revenue growth of 1.68% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
0.02%
Gross profit growth of 0.02% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
0.37%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.37%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 10.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.85%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.85%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-29.69%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3.56%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 150.08%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
3.57%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
157.92%
10Y CAGR of 157.92% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
0.79%
5Y CAGR of 0.79% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-0.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 123.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-19.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is at 130.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-13.05%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
74.58%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 33.09% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-55.47%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 78.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
1100.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 54.69%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
235.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 164.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
36.34%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 23.74%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
14.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SA's 13.92%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.06%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
65.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 65.81% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
56.16%
AR growth well above SA's 62.41%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.01%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.66%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.39%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 24.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.