PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.46%
Revenue growth of 19.46% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
15.06%
Gross profit growth of 15.06% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
16.70%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
16.70%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-306.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-306.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-306.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.81%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-9.68%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
27.85%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
27.22%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
143.50%
10Y CAGR of 143.50% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-32.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
44.73%
3Y CAGR of 44.73% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
141.95%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-47.98%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
46.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-379.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-162.02%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-321.70%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
215.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 165.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
26.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 9.81%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
13.10%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 15.20%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.02%
Dividend/share CAGR of 7.02% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
62.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 62.84% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-45.82%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.45%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-9.84%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.