PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.60%
Revenue growth of 6.60% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
2.05%
Gross profit growth of 2.05% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
2.39%
EBIT growth below 50% of SA's 74.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.39%
Operating income growth under 50% of SA's 74.36%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
367.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x SA's 77.49%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
380.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 77.39%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
380.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 77.39%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.10%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.89%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.89%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 63.48%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-483.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
115.86%
10Y CAGR of 115.86% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
1.89%
5Y CAGR of 1.89% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
17.79%
3Y CAGR of 17.79% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
90.20%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-13.59%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
12.80%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
590.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
258.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 80.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
439.98%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
227.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 169.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
30.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 19.13%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
6.84%
Below 50% of SA's 15.84%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.93%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
71.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 71.00% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
453.10%
AR growth well above SA's 115.93%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 5.22%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.16%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 2.08%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
44.27%
Debt growth of 44.27% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.