PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.83%
Revenue growth of 5.83% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
12.55%
Gross profit growth of 12.55% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-10.38%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.38%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-79.93%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-81.25%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-81.25%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 3.63%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
1.54%
Dividend growth of 1.54% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
0.04%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
126.84%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 11.17%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
222.40%
10Y CAGR of 222.40% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-5.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-11.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
210.51%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-29.99%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-26.27%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
108.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-94.15%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
103.66%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
254.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 142.69%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
23.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 16.44%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
12.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 14.74%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
77.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 77.66% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
118.02%
AR growth well above SA's 43.23%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 3.75%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.46%
We have a declining book value while SA shows 4.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-8.44%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
SG&A growth well above SA's 47.17%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.