PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.48%
Revenue growth of 14.48% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
34.24%
Gross profit growth of 34.24% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
61.16%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
61.16%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
739.91%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
766.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 1.04%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
766.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.97%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 57.53%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
9.36%
FCF growth under 50% of SA's 59.76%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
264.31%
10Y CAGR of 264.31% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
9.44%
5Y CAGR of 9.44% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
8.83%
3Y CAGR of 8.83% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
210.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 71.11%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-17.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is at 11.31%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-5.79%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
130.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-42.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
26.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
180.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 139.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
22.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 18.22%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
14.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 11.60%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.61%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 9.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 0.59%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.04%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.01%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.36%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 28.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.