PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.81%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.27%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-256.60%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 43.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-256.60%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 43.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-317.43%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 50.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-315.38%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 50.45%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-315.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 50.45%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.31%
Share count expansion well above SA's 0.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.30%
Diluted share count expanding well above SA's 0.40%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 16.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.06%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
205.89%
10Y CAGR of 205.89% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
2.32%
5Y CAGR of 2.32% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-12.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
176.09%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-14.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-20.28%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-552.06%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SA is at 3.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-257.57%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 58.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-302.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 9.27%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
161.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 140.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
17.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SA's 18.41%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
3.49%
Below 50% of SA's 7.37%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.77%
Dividend/share CAGR of 13.77% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
69.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 69.37% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-27.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 16.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.67%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.48%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.45%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.