PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.17%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.25%
Gross profit growth of 0.25% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
3.15%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.15%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.06%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.00%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.75%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
3.61%
Dividend growth of 3.61% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.33%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-7.91%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
88.45%
10Y CAGR of 88.45% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
31.69%
5Y CAGR of 31.69% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-14.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
42.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
16.03%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-25.58%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
16.64%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
23.39%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 43.00%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
603.37%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
136.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 147.47%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
21.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SA's 22.09%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
6.29%
Below 50% of SA's 28.49%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.38% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
47.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 47.34% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
17.16%
AR growth well above SA's 15.33%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.16%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-13.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SA's 65.98%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.