PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.14%
Revenue growth of 14.14% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
28.42%
Gross profit growth of 28.42% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
30.60%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SA's 2.40%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
30.60%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 2.40%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
22.41%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.53%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
34.67%
OCF growth above 1.5x SA's 13.71%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
35.67%
FCF growth similar to SA's 37.55%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
126.65%
10Y CAGR of 126.65% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
61.68%
5Y CAGR of 61.68% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
26.90%
3Y CAGR of 26.90% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
135.70%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
65.00%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 9.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
45.99%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 12.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
62.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
59.02%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 1.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
52.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
125.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 56.81%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-2.02%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SA is at 24.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.78%
Below 50% of SA's 14.91%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.93%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 13.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.20%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 1.15%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.65%
We have a declining book value while SA shows 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-18.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.