PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.24%
Revenue growth of 13.24% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
8.19%
Gross profit growth of 8.19% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
7.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of SA's 62.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.00%
Operating income growth under 50% of SA's 62.91%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.04%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 66.13%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.86%
EPS growth under 50% of SA's 66.12%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.86%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SA's 66.12%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
11.63%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 8.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
-63.01%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 91.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
60.86%
10Y CAGR of 60.86% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
54.95%
5Y CAGR of 54.95% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
60.21%
3Y CAGR of 60.21% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
43.28%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
82.95%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
82.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
4.10%
Below 50% of SA's 24.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
254.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
134.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 68.76%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
90.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 97.22%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
25.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 47.68%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
16.45%
Below 50% of SA's 37.32%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-31.41%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.48%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 1.25%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.90%
1.25-1.5x SA's 1.39%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-98.25%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 33.06%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.