PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.94%
Revenue growth of 1.94% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
3.70%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SA's 10.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.01%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 58.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.01%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 58.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
2.54%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 439.51%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.78%
EPS growth under 50% of SA's 429.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.78%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SA's 429.86%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.13%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.82%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 4.53%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 136.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
97.38%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 8.38%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
33.15%
10Y CAGR of 33.15% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
50.97%
5Y CAGR of 50.97% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
53.17%
3Y CAGR of 53.17% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
0.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
56.40%
Below 50% of SA's 318.56%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
57.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 274.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-11.94%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SA is at 197.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
167.29%
Below 50% of SA's 629.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-48.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 571.53%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
90.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 83.35%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
19.17%
Below 50% of SA's 51.00%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.80%
Below 50% of SA's 42.55%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
666.81%
Dividend/share CAGR of 666.81% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
173.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 173.48% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
57.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 57.86% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
139.98%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.95%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.89%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 9.21%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.93%
Under 50% of SA's 5.97%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.