PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.44%
Revenue growth of 3.44% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-0.52%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
3.37%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.37%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
116.27%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
116.67%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
116.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-2.98%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-154.52%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
13.83%
10Y CAGR of 13.83% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
5.51%
5Y CAGR of 5.51% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
39.64%
3Y CAGR of 39.64% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
-6.33%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
9.59%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
77.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
58.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 12.02% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2532.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
4117.56%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
84.86%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 77.49%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
24.04%
Below 50% of SA's 75.66%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.25%
Below 50% of SA's 39.29%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
41.31%
Dividend/share CAGR of 41.31% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
147.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 147.79% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
64.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.03% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.97%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
42.63%
Inventory growth of 42.63% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.12%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 1.95%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 0.84%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.08%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.95%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SA's 158.60%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.