PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.44%
Revenue growth of 10.44% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
19.36%
Positive gross profit growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.09%
EBIT growth below 50% of SA's 49.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.09%
Operating income growth under 50% of SA's 49.98%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 26.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-46.15%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 27.91%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-46.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 27.91%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.13%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.05%
Diluted share change of 0.05% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
7.81%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
251.29%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 47.59%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
20.66%
10Y CAGR of 20.66% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
51.97%
5Y CAGR of 51.97% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
34.55%
3Y CAGR of 34.55% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
0.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
71.89%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
75.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-16.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
151.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
170.60%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
80.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SA's 79.51%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
24.93%
Below 50% of SA's 56.52%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.74%
Below 50% of SA's 42.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.73%
AR growth of 118.73% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-15.06%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.76%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 38.36%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.46%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 0.40%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.09%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 103359.93%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.