PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.41%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-9.76%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-6.19%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 748.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.19%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 748.25%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 403.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.71%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 402.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 402.65%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.14%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.13%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 2.30%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 158.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
15.97%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
17.83%
10Y CAGR of 17.83% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
48.43%
5Y CAGR of 48.43% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
57.84%
3Y CAGR of 57.84% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
-6.51%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 755.38%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
61.94%
Below 50% of SA's 698.35%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
86.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 277.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-17.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SA is at 553.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
115.73%
Below 50% of SA's 883.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
218.03%
Below 50% of SA's 823.28%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
76.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 88.26%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
24.80%
Below 50% of SA's 50.79%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
23.93%
Below 50% of SA's 50.15%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
44.13%
Dividend/share CAGR of 44.13% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
119.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 119.91% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
82.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.04% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-46.31%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 68.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
61.49%
Inventory growth of 61.49% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-0.33%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 3.76%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.92%
Under 50% of SA's 5.37%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-9.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.