PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-27.76%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-37.06%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 79.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-31.50%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-31.50%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
31.79%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.30%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.30%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.17%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while SA is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-52.12%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-25.13%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 91.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.96%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
6.31%
10Y CAGR of 6.31% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
5.48%
5Y CAGR of 5.48% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-3.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-5.92%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 798.02%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
17.09%
Below 50% of SA's 2221.93%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
7.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 853.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
28.59%
Below 50% of SA's 151.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
188.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 335.13%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
155.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of SA's 255.96%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
72.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 90.58%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
26.47%
Below 50% of SA's 54.02%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
24.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 44.96%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
24.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.20% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
49.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 49.75% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
70.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 70.16% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-31.31%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 67.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.56%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.15%
Similar asset growth to SA's 2.26%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
2.00%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SA's 0.73%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.95%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 4.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.