Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Revenue growth of 7.87% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.32%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.

Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.36%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.

Dividend growth of 7.85% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

3Y CAGR of 4.75% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.

Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.

Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 61.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.

Dividend/share CAGR of 91.37% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 78.81% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 77.13% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 19.27%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.