PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.55%
Revenue growth of 23.55% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
29.24%
Positive gross profit growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
37.10%
EBIT growth below 50% of SA's 157.06%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
37.10%
Operating income growth under 50% of SA's 157.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
26.98%
Net income growth under 50% of SA's 183.32%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
28.00%
EPS growth under 50% of SA's 184.62%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SA's 184.62%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.12%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.08%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.34%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.79%
Similar OCF growth to SA's 54.48%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
10.57%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.38%
10Y CAGR of 24.38% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
22.08%
5Y CAGR of 22.08% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
5.86%
3Y CAGR of 5.86% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
26.57%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
46.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
32.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 45.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
55.82%
Below 50% of SA's 151.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-56.49%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SA is 367.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
32.42%
Below 50% of SA's 275.48%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
66.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 78.36%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
27.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 49.72%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
25.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 32.88%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
13.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 13.23% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
101.95%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.95% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
59.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 59.08% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-26.61%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-24.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.37%
Negative asset growth while SA invests at 21.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.38%
Under 50% of SA's 4.10%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
269.36%
Debt growth far above SA's 61.43%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.