Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Revenue growth of 44.37% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.

Gross profit growth of 43.20% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.

Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 3.14%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.

Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 3.14%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.

Dividend growth of 3.51% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

10Y CAGR of 51.80% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.

5Y CAGR of 60.74% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.

3Y CAGR of 11.68% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 25.69%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 25.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 53.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 2.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Dividend/share CAGR of 68.43% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 95.52% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 45.29% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Inventory is declining while SA stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.

Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 17.34%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

SG&A declining or stable vs. SA's 55.83%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.