PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.27%
Negative revenue growth while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.18%
Negative gross profit growth while SA is at 3.06%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-4.08%
Negative EBIT growth while SA is at 20.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.08%
Negative operating income growth while SA is at 20.90%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-2.61%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 63.14%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.26%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 63.62%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.26%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 63.62%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.34%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 0.34%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-11.81%
Negative OCF growth while SA is at 118.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-9.47%
Negative FCF growth while SA is at 46.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
40.93%
10Y CAGR of 40.93% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
28.77%
5Y CAGR of 28.77% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-9.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
50.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SA's 129.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
81.81%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 133.09%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-6.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA stands at 128.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
62.13%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
180.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
0.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SA's 55.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
32.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SA's 31.39%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
20.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while SA is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.46%
Firm’s AR is declining while SA shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.54%
Positive asset growth while SA is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.74%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.23%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 4.02%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.25%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.