PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.19%
Revenue growth of 1.19% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
9.00%
Positive gross profit growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
6.22%
Positive EBIT growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.22%
Positive operating income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-25.44%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 653.54%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while SA is at 639.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SA is at 639.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.76%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 2.23%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
176.60%
FCF growth above 1.5x SA's 40.36%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
58.74%
10Y CAGR of 58.74% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
55.15%
5Y CAGR of 55.15% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-10.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
79.88%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
110.42%
Positive OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
7.26%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
51.96%
Below 50% of SA's 741.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
196.44%
Below 50% of SA's 1662.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-26.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SA is 167.90%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
61.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 81.00%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
37.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 52.86%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
19.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 8.69%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
144.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 144.99% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
115.34%
Dividend/share CAGR of 115.34% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
33.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 33.37% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
80.90%
Our AR growth while SA is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-8195400.00%
Inventory is declining while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.97%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 4.99%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.18%
Under 50% of SA's 16.01%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.35%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.05%
SG&A growth well above SA's 4.06%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.