PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.09%
Revenue growth of 3.09% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
6.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SA's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
4.11%
EBIT growth below 50% of SA's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.11%
Operating income growth under 50% of SA's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
26.42%
Positive net income growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.93%
Positive EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.93%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.90%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.43%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-49.72%
Dividend reduction while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.76%
OCF growth under 50% of SA's 86.04%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
20.73%
Positive FCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
46.83%
10Y CAGR of 46.83% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
35.78%
5Y CAGR of 35.78% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
13.77%
3Y CAGR of 13.77% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
66.91%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
76.04%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 12.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
25.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2617.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
100.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
13.76%
Positive short-term CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
59.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 76.97%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
37.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 46.22%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
20.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 8.38%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
208.45%
Dividend/share CAGR of 208.45% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
111.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 111.38% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
21.38%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 21.38% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
35.90%
AR growth of 35.90% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.90%
Asset growth above 1.5x SA's 1.26%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.34%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.26%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 4.85%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.27%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.