95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.44%
Revenue growth of 23.44% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
60.21%
Gross profit growth of 60.21% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-31.17%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-33.15%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-43.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-44.12%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-44.12%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.25%
Share reduction while SA is at 1.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 1.11%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.19%
Dividend growth of 0.19% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
25.61%
Positive OCF growth while SA is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-8.90%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
121.58%
10Y CAGR of 121.58% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
68.26%
5Y CAGR of 68.26% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
35.77%
3Y CAGR of 35.77% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
177.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 48.11%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
139.14%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 55.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 74.03%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
38.48%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
12.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SA is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-70.02%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
63.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 73.35%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
34.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SA's 41.98%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
15.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SA's 3.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
235.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 235.15% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
103.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 103.88% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
21.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 21.23% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-47.47%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
Asset growth well under 50% of SA's 1.75%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.24%
Positive BV/share change while SA is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-8.70%
We’re deleveraging while SA stands at 11.09%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.40%
We cut SG&A while SA invests at 93.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.