PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Revenue growth of 23.62% while SA is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
0.89%
Gross profit growth of 0.89% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
136.68%
EBIT growth similar to SA's 135.66%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
147.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SA's 46.81%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
188.14%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SA's 125.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
194.74%
EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 123.91%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SA's 123.91%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 5.59%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SA's 6.00%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
10Y CAGR of 194.63% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
82.23%
5Y CAGR of 82.23% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
52.17%
3Y CAGR of 52.17% while SA is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Similar net income/share CAGR to SA's 316.60%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
164.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SA's 320.03%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
60.31%
Below 50% of SA's 239.17%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
We expand SG&A while SA cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.