95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
35.21%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
35.21%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SAND's 13.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
103.36%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SAND's 26.92%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
103.36%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
103.36%
Net income growth above 1.5x SAND's 47.17%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
103.35%
EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 50.56%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
103.35%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 49.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.25%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
86.25%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
17.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 34.25%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
17.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 75.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.60%
AR growth well above SAND's 18.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
10.87%
Inventory growth of 10.87% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
5.90%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.98%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.38%
SG&A growth well above SAND's 2.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.