PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.65%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
38.65%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SAND's 13.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
73.73%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SAND's 26.92%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
73.73%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
58.05%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 47.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
63.85%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 50.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
63.85%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 49.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.32%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
98.32%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
82.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 34.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to SAND's 75.49%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
36511827.79%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.28%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74837.44%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SAND's 18.98%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
25.00%
Inventory growth of 25.00% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
13.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
15.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.33%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.27%
SG&A growth well above SAND's 2.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.