PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-199.50%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-199.50%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 13.91%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-251.32%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 26.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-251.32%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 8.63%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-511.39%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 47.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-511.27%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 50.56%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-511.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 49.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1856.19%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1856.19%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-278.69%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SAND stands at 34.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-278.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SAND stands at 75.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-36363820.17%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.92%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31219.63%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 18.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-41.90%
Negative asset growth while SAND invests at 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-33.48%
We have a declining book value while SAND shows 2.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.08%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.