PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.82%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
26.25%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SAND's 13.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
25.56%
EBIT growth similar to SAND's 26.92%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
25.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
29.72%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SAND's 47.17%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
33.33%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SAND's 50.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SAND's 49.43%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.53%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 0.38%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.67%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
79.67%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
45.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 34.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
-25.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SAND stands at 75.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
24.33%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
569.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1286.38%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
283.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 50.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.91%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 18.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.18%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.59%
SG&A growth well above SAND's 2.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.