95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.14%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.47%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 13.91%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-7.96%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 26.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.96%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 8.63%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-5.12%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 47.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.31%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 0.38%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.11%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.11%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
46.59%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 34.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
24.76%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 75.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
36.40%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 99.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-45.21%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.86%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
196.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 41.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
188.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 52.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
291.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 50.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.63%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 18.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.14%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.33%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.