PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.36%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
9.63%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of SAND's 13.91%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
17.56%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SAND's 26.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
17.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
9.89%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 47.17%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-5.00%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 50.56%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 49.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
10.37%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
20.16%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 0.38%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.69%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
24.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 34.25%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
25016083.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 75.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-0.92%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6533.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 99.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
505.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133689.28%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 38.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
637.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
432.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 50.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
513.55%
AR growth well above SAND's 18.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.07%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
38.01%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.86%
SG&A growth well above SAND's 2.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.