PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.91%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-13.92%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 13.91%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-16.76%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 26.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.76%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 8.63%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-10.50%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 47.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-16.67%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 50.56%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 49.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.61%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.64%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 0.38%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
156.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 34.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-43.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SAND stands at 75.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
90.09%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3232.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 99.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
785.71%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2933.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 38.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
658.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
698.75%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 41.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
729.85%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 52.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1036.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 50.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 18.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.87%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.31%
Similar to SAND's 2.17%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.62%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.