PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.51%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
6.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SAND's 13.91%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
118.24%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SAND's 26.92%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
118.24%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
5.52%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 47.17%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 50.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 49.43%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.25%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.72%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 0.38%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
5.55%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
160.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 34.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
144.72%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 75.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
42.93%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2634.32%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 99.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
43040.45%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3534.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 38.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
405.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
766.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 52.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
921.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 50.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 18.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.88%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.28%
SG&A growth well above SAND's 2.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.