PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.50%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.30%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-5.62%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-5.62%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-16.06%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.11%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.34%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 38.76%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 38.76%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.65%
Negative OCF growth while SAND is at 105.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-2.65%
Negative FCF growth while SAND is at 105.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
141.24%
10Y CAGR of 141.24% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
124.47%
5Y CAGR of 124.47% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.43%
OCF/share CAGR of 40.43% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-7.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.91%
Net income/share CAGR of 622.91% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
229.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 229.95% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
874.54%
Equity/share CAGR of 874.54% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
1188.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 1188.92% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-88.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SAND is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.81%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 21.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.34%
Asset growth at 50-75% of SAND's 112.02%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.70%
Under 50% of SAND's 81.84%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.06%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 53.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.