PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.85%
Revenue growth of 26.85% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
32.57%
Gross profit growth of 32.57% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
31.93%
EBIT growth below 50% of SAND's 77.03%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
31.93%
Operating income growth under 50% of SAND's 77.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
29.71%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 83.75%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
22.22%
EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 88.58%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 88.58%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.39%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 41.65%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.49%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 41.65%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.93%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
26.93%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
196.70%
10Y CAGR of 196.70% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
135.29%
5Y CAGR of 135.29% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
137.47%
3Y CAGR of 137.47% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2148.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 2148.09% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
271.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 271.35% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2063.83%
Net income/share CAGR of 2063.83% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
193.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 193.27% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1201.26%
Equity/share CAGR of 1201.26% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
144.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 144.59% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.70%
AR growth well above SAND's 4.90%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.11%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.54%
Positive BV/share change while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.49%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.77%
We expand SG&A while SAND cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.